Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Future Names and Stupid Shit That Parents Foist On Their Kids

Names, as in these words derived of alphabetic symbols that usually dudn't mean didly belunkus, will no longer exist in the future.

I mean, really, what the fuck do names mean anyway?

When it is as easy as it is now to change your name, there is no reason to use names in formal situations, and in general, since their reliability is questionable.

So, then, the only reliable- kind of, but you can't change it, only fake it- title possible is the social security number.

You can't change your social security number and, so far, we can't use our DNA as our name effectively but that too is something that, so far, can't be changed and we can't effectively use as a name. Now, you could also fake whatever machine might test your DNA- doesn't matter how elaborate the device may be, where there is a will there is a way and all things made by man will inherit his flawed status. Also, no two people should have the same social security number, but can't twins, triplets... etc. have the same genes?

Thus, our names will be social security numbers.

But how would you tell who someone's parents are?

Rather than have the present use of last name's that can hold stigmas and preconceived notions of what the word means, children would have to memorize their parents' social security numbers as their last name. Of course, parents, particularly drugged baby boomers and, even more so, celebrities, won't have a chance to fuck up a kid's future with absolutely fucking stupid first names. Apple!? Majesty!? Come on...

But, what I find more interesting is the possibility that rather than forcing children to adopt their parent's religion, kids will be forced to sign up for their parents' bank.

The future is likely to be ruled by corporate beings that have bought the government, and will be writing the laws themselves... even more than they do now, so it would make some sense that business aspects will becoming the supplement for religion in the days to be.

No comments: